DUTY, HONOR, COURAGE, RESILIANCE

           Talking Proud: Service & Sacrifice

‍Look, Mom, I lost my tail! 

‍You might have seen this photo of a B-52 bomber flying without its tail. Here’s the story behind this flight. The skipper brought her in safely, but “it weren’t easy!”


‍On January 10, 1964, Boeing civilian test pilot Chuck Fisher and his three-man crew lost their tail, the tail of their B-52H Stratofortress, at about 14,000 ft. over northern New Mexico's Sangre de Cristo Mountains. Their mission was to shake, rattle, and roll this big beast at high speed and low altitude to record sensor data on how such a profile affected the B-52's structure. They did their job. The vertical stabilizer blew off, to wit, she lost her tail! 


‍Six hours later and after a lot of engineering on the ground and in the air, Fisher brought his B-52 home with the coveted data. Many crews put their lives on the line to make this aircraft the threat it was and is. Those who lost their lives must be looking down from Heaven in wonderment that the old beast is still one of the most feared weapon systems in the world.


‍The opening photo tells the story. That is B-52H Stratofortress long-range bomber tail number 61-023 airborne over the US with most of her vertical stabilizer sheared off, rear landing gears down for stabilization. Believe it or not, this Boeing test flight crew brought their bird down safely, but it wasn't easy.


‍The B-52 has long held the nickname "Buff," which stands for "Big Ugly Fat Fellow," with the understanding that few in the Air Force ever used the word "fellow." 


‍Early on in her career, the B-52 experienced turbulence-induced structural failures. The B-52 was designed for high-altitude, high-speed penetration of Soviet airspace to drop nuclear weapons on specified, high-value targets. However, several years after the aircraft had been designed and was in production, the Air Force came to realize that the Soviets had fielded such a sophisticated, layered and interconnected air defense system with radar controlled surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) as the cornerstone that it decided the B-52 would have to go in at low altitude and high speed. The B-52 was not designed for that. However, that was the assigned mission, so testing was necessary to identify fixes.


‍It was widely known that a low-altitude, high-speed flight profile would put enormous stress on the aircraft's structure. That would be especially true when flying near mountains and up and down their ridges and valleys, which is what would have to be done when penetrating the Soviet Union in a nuclear attack. 


‍Jim Goodell, a Boeing test pilot, tells that John Rutherford, a colleague, would take the B-52 over to the Rockies, start at the bottom of a 10,000 ft. ridge at 325 knots, and hump over the top at about 200 knots, with the crew wondering if he would run out of speed before he made it over. But making it over the top was just one problem. Going down the other side, especially if it is the leeward side, presented other tough challenges. There's a lot of science behind what is referred to as wind rotors. I will simply say that if your aircraft gets caught in one, the pilot has his hands full. If his aircraft were not designed to withstand this kind of turbulence, then it would get even worse.


‍The Air Force early on experienced tail sections and stabilizers breaking off, her enormous wings were experiencing considerable fatigue, aircraft were crashing, and crews were being lost. As a result, the Air Force tasked Boeing to conduct aggressive low-altitude testing.


‍The USAF loaned B-52H No. 061-023 aircraft to Boeing to conduct test flights. The aircraft was outfitted with 20 accelerometers and over 200 sensors to measure and record stresses on the airframe.


‍Boeing test pilot Chuck Fisher and a crew of three were tasked with taking 023 out for a shakedown flight and obtaining the necessary structural recordings to evaluate the modifications needed to enable this aircraft to fly the profile it would have to fly to take down the Soviets.


‍While over Colorado on January 10, 1964, Fisher was flying at 500 ft. and hit turbulence. The tests had been running smoothly prior to that, so he aborted this part of the flight plan. The crew took a short lunch.


‍Fisher then climbed to 14,300 ft. looking for smoother air. Speed was reported at 350 Knots Indicated Air Speed (KIAS). At about that altitude, he encountered severe clear air turbulence that rattled the aircraft throughout the sky. Fisher was about five miles east of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains in Mora, New Mexico, not far from southern Colorado.


‍James Pitman, the Boeing navigator, said this:


‍"When this event occurred, it was so violent that I was literally picked up and thrown against the left side of the airplane and over the navigator's table." 


‍Fisher commented:


‍"I had the rudder to the firewall, the control column in my lap, and full wheel input and I wasn't having any luck righting the airplane. In the short period after the turbulence I gave the order to prepare to abandon the airplane because I didn't think we were going to keep it together." 


‍Immediately after the severe turbulence, the jet rolled hard right and almost went out of control. Fisher said this:


‍"It required about 80 percent left wheel throw to control the aircraft by the time things had settled down." 


‍Fisher descended to 5,000 ft. and advised the crew to prepare for bailout. Then, almost miraculously, he regained control. He climbed back up to 16,000 ft.


‍Fisher was flying, but he was experiencing a lot of stability problems. He knew he had problems, but he did not know the full extent of what they were.


‍Much like we have seen done when there are problems with space flights, Boeing's Wichita plant assembled the pros, including civilians and USAF personnel, into an Emergency Control Center (ECC) to determine the next steps. Wichita launched one of its F-100 chase aircraft to conduct a visual check. In the mean time, Fisher would have to keep his aircraft aloft and give the ECC as much information as he could provide.


‍Dale Felix was the F-100 pilot for this ride. He was an experienced B-29 pilot at Boeing, having learned to fly all the aircraft in the company's flight test inventory. He would later become the Chief of Boeing Wichita Flight Test.


‍After marrying up with the beleaguered B-52, Felix reported that Fisher had lost his vertical tail. This explained a lot. It meant he had lost his vertical fin and rudder, which, in turn, meant he had no directional stability. The aircraft could have rolled or gone down. Fisher put down the rear landing gear to add some stability and flew the rest of the flight in that configuration. 


‍The tail stub remained. That turned out to be helpful.


‍The engineers and pilots worked on the problem for six hours, while Fisher and his crew kept the aircraft airborne. A USAF B-52 on a routine training flight launched to test various flight configurations the beleaguered test aircraft might use to land.


‍A plan emerged. Winds were high at Wichita, so it was scrubbed as a landing site. Instead, Eaker AFB, Blytheville, Arkansas, was selected. It hosted the 97th Bombardment Wing (BW) flying the B-52G and KC-135A tankers, so the airfield, support people, and equipment were well-suited for the job of recovery. Winds at Blytheville were calm, and the area was sparsely populated in case of a crash. Furthermore, Fisher could take a southern route to Blytheville that would avoid having to deal with the downslope winds off the Rockies.


‍The plan called for the following: transfer on-board fuel to different tanks to account for the lost weight of the vertical stabilizer and adjust the center of gravity accordingly; change engine settings for descent and landing from those normally used; apply only a small amount of air brakes; set landing speed at 200 knots.

‍A KC-135 tanker with engineers aboard launched to serve as an airborne control center and escort aircraft.


‍On the approach to Blytheville, Fisher lowered the front gear. You will recall he had much earlier lowered the rear gears to add stability. The front gear coming down made the aircraft yaw, but everything settled down once the gear was fully extended.


‍Fisher landed the aircraft safely. And with that success, the engineers were able to get the recorded structural data to develop long-term solutions. 


‍These recordings showed that a gust hit the aircraft with a hurricane force. I have seen one report that said the gust was 81 mph. A Boeing memorandum of January 24, 1964 purportedly said the following:


‍"... flown through an area containing the combined effects of a (wind) rotor associated with a mountain wave and lateral shear due to airflow around a large peak ... Gust initially built up from the right to a maximum of about 45 feet per second (TAS), then reversed to a maximum of 36 feet per second from the left, before swinging to a maximum of about 147 feet per second from the left followed by a return to 31 feet per second."


‍My calculation of 147 feet per second is about 100 mph.


‍Fisher would later recount, as reported in Aerospace Safety, April 1964:


‍"As the encounter progressed, a very sharp- edged blow which was followed by many more. We developed an almost instantaneous rate of roll at fairly high rate. The roll was to the far left and the nose was swinging up and to the right at a rapid rate. During the second portion of the encounter, the airplane motions actually seemed to be negating my control inputs. I had the rudder to the firewall, the column in my lap, and full wheel, and I wasn’t having any luck righting the airplane."


‍Ray Lahr, a graduate engineer from USC and former Navy WWII pilot, commented on Fisher's crash. He said that the B-52 design caused the vertical stabilizer to be placed more forward than usual, causing the entire fuselage to be a stabilizing force in a feathered arrow effect, a good thing in this case. Furthermore, he added that the entire stabilizer did not break off, which allowed enough lateral stability to make a constructive, positive difference.


‍I have seen one report that reflects the importance of Chuck Fisher bringing his Buff in safely. This report stated that the data indicated that turbulence would overstress the rudder connection bolts, leading to a rudder failure and subsequently a tail failure. This report said the bolts were strengthened to fix the problem.


‍A year earlier, on January 23, 1963, a B-52C lost its vertical stabilizer during a training flight. It too was stressed by buffeting during turbulence at low altitude and crashed in Maine. It was the second B-52 to suffer this kind of structural failure. The bolts were strengthened throughout the fleet. Five of the eight crew died.


‍Fisher's B-52H Nr. 61-023 has been stored at Davis-Monthan AFB in Tucson. Chuck Fisher, even after this flight, said,


‍"(The B-52) is the finest airplane I ever flew."

Click to zoom graphic-photo

Ed Marek, editor

Marek logo

Marek Enterprise

224 N Barstow St Suite 426

Eau Claire, WI 54703

© Copyright 2025